Oh so friends we'll talk about the relationship between man's version history what is unfolding it is the study of or science or science of study of gossamer G combination work a study of biological as well as social cultural evolution and videos details I thought when I talk told about what is that .
Fortune and what is history which history is the account of the time period of which written records are available and language has been deciphered the people who define the history in terms of what causes pasts that is redefined bathrom n2n from return the calls availability and language can be understood industrially .
Script is here but understood is not so that this proto is so it's a stage it is account of that stage of which return records are available and what kind of records socio-cultural records he not Foley we study social cultural experts but as for he has a much bigger by a paradigm because we study biological experts also and again while .
Talking about sociology I told you that when you compare social sciences compared with social cultural anthropology don't make political and policy as a difference between social sciences and can't force so here also we study cultures social culture so what is the difference between the .
Two first thing is that they say history is based on facts targeted if it is based on facts that why we have debates why we have leftist rightist nationalists Abidin and all of them they argue being selective in terms of X that fold is based on ffense the .
Fieldwork that will conduct say for example I studied bow tears and whatever I did all those who quote me they would be writing back 1978-79 whatever it is nobody is going there to find out whatever I studied whether it is true or not means it will depend on my honesty same day he also depends on the honesty of the history writer .
For example which is there with you it is that during emergency mrs. Gandhi appointed historians to write history Indian history and they put it in the time capsule and they buried in red food with a shirali that if Indians they dig it out after hundred years they'll find what we were 100 years ago next year the government came they dug it out and they .
Found that name of negligible service was not their subjectivity one simple thing can be you can say in history you start from the past and come to the present ancient than medieval then bottom in and for thee we study the present and try to look into the past another way to look is that time is an .
Ongoing process what will you call presence and what will you call past what is present today will become past tomorrow whatever was present yesterday is past today if you combine both these things then HP is upside down hands apology or and spoiled is observed on upside down history .
We had to put a line between that in history when they study if you talk about the history of six seven decades ago it was a political history history of emperors and kings and it was a political issue and then it started social history cultural history economics religious history and all these aspects you have been studying in .
Anthropology from Acharya and you can clearly say that history borrowed from Hanceville but then when we study present with respect to past because the kind of societies we study they do not have any literary traditions so whatever is available to us in terms of history we borrow from them this give-and-take continues .
Just one striking difference you can say between the participant observation in sociology discussion I told you they rely on scheduled and questionnaires and interviews and hey see you you could not have participant observation of previous times you have to rely on secondary sources thankful he created participant observation unique that has to reach the .
Truth we do take the help of secondary sources wherever is needed but we rely on participant observation but in history in the contemporary history writing they are taking the help of participant observation as well like giving John there what he has written after 1947 he has taken the help of participant observation .
That she is that we used to compare between different disciplines long back today we don't this is good or this is bad today what we follow we call it international interdisciplinary approach scientists from different disciplines and from across different countries they exchange their knowledge their expertise .
We try to bring different disciplines on a common platform and we want different disciplines to benefit from each other these comparisons these are outdated we don't have anymore